Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Effects of supplementation with milk protein on glycemic parameters: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

Nutrition Journal volume 22, Article number: 49 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

It is suggested that supplementation with milk protein (MP) has the potential to ameliorate the glycemic profile; however, the exact impact and certainty of the findings have yet to be evaluated. This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the impact of MP supplementation on the glycemic parameters in adults.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out among online databases to determine eligible RCTs published up to November 2022. A random-effects model was performed for the meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 36 RCTs with 1851 participants were included in the pooled analysis. It was displayed that supplementation with MP effectively reduced levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG) (weighted mean difference (WMD): -1.83 mg/dL, 95% CI: -3.28, -0.38; P = 0.013), fasting insulin (WMD: -1.06 uU/mL, 95% CI: -1.76, -0.36; P = 0.003), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (WMD: -0.27, 95% CI: -0.40, -0.14; P < 0.001) while making no remarkable changes in serum hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values (WMD: 0.01%, 95% CI: -0.14, 0.16; P = 0.891). However, there was a significant decline in serum levels of HbA1c among participants with normal baseline body mass index (BMI) based on sub-group analyses. In addition, HOMA-IR values were significantly lower in the MP supplement-treated group than their untreated counterparts in short- and long-term supplementation (≤ 8 and > 8 weeks) with high or moderate doses (≥ 60 or 30–60 g/d) of MP or whey protein (WP). Serum FBG levels were considerably reduced upon short-term administration of a low daily dose of WP (< 30 g). Furthermore, the levels of serum fasting insulin were remarkably decreased during long-term supplementation with high or moderate daily doses of WP.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that supplementation with MP may improve glycemic control in adults by reducing the values of fasting insulin, FBG, and HOMA-IR. Additional trials with longer durations are required to confirm these findings.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The increasing prevalence and burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hyperglycemia (very high blood sugar) is a major global health concern [1, 2]. A high blood glucose (HBG) level is a common problem for diabetic patients [2]. Long-term exposure to HBG is the primary causal factor in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications [3]. Hyperglycemia is caused by reduced glucose utilization, increased glucose production, and decreased insulin secretion [4]. It is a potential target to enhance clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute disease, even without overt diabetes [5]. It has been suggested that each 1 mg/ dL increment in fasting glucose concentration may increase the risk of developing diabetes by 9% [6].

Hyperglycemia causes a lot of changes in vascular tissue that could lead to accelerated atherosclerosis [3]. In addition, HBG raises the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals [7]. Furthermore, HBG can be diagnosed in hospitalized patients, even those without diabetes [8]. It can change innate immune responses to infection, leading to poor outcomes in these patients [8]. Therefore, it is essential to monitor blood glucose levels, normalize hyperglycemia, and prevent hyperglycemia-induced complications [9].

Consumption of food products that contain digestible carbohydrates (CHO) can cause postprandial HBG and glycemic responses [10]. A healthy eating pattern is one of the key components of HBG management [11,12,13,14]. Cow milk is a food item necessary for a balanced diet and contains several essential micro- and macronutrients [15]. Lactose is the major carbohydrate with a low glycemic index (GI) in dairy products and a disaccharide of glucose and galactose [10]. The lower GI of dairy products has been linked to their matrix for controlling gastric emptying and the presence of lactose [16, 17]. It was reported that the addition of dairy products to high-carbohydrate meals may reduce postprandial blood glucose levels and have a favorable impact on glycemic profile [18]. It decreases post-meal glycemia when consumed during or before an ad libitum meal [19]. In addition, it may deliver comparatively high levels of CHO with limited glycemic responses [10]. However, glycemic reactions following the consumption of milk products are uncertain and controversial [10].

Bovine milk is a major source of high-quality proteins with various nutritional, physiological, and functional benefits [20]. Milk proteins (MP) have health-promoting effects such as digestion and absorption of nutrients, stimulation of the immune system, and prebiotic effects [21, 22]. They may have hypotensive, anticancer, satiating, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and insulinotropic properties [21, 23], as well as the potential to increase muscle protein synthesis [24]. Casein and whey are the main proteins in dairy products that account for 80% and 20% of the amino acids (AAs) in milk, respectively [25]. They are two of the most common types of protein available on the market with different absorption rates and bioavailability [26]. Whey protein (WP) is rapidly digested, whereas casein protein (CP) is classified as a high-quality protein source [23] with slow digestion and absorption [27] that provides all essential AAs to humans, except cysteine [28]. In contrast, WP has a higher proportion of valine, isoleucine, and leucine (essential AAs that are identified as branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs)) than CP [29]. However, non-essential AAs are more abundant in CP [29].

It has been found that proteins are useful in triggering insulin secretion in T2DM patients [30]. The evidence suggests that MP enhances the postprandial insulin response and reduces the postprandial blood glucose response in healthy individuals [31,32,33] and T2DM patients [1, 34, 35]. The precise mechanisms by which protein of milk lowers the levels of postprandial glucose remain to be determined [36]. The hypothesis is that the AAs and bioactive peptides in MP may lead to delayed gastric emptying, increased incretin and insulin response, and a decrease in postprandial glucose levels [36].

A limited number of reviews and meta-analyses have explored the effects of WP supplementation or dairy products on glycemic control, but they focused only on patients with T2DM [36,37,38,39]. The effects of MP supplements on the glycemic profile of different types of consumers were not well investigated and the outcomes of the studies were controversial or inclusive. In addition, meta-analyses of observational studies have higher risks of bias and heterogeneity compared to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [40]. The main problems in observational studies are confounders and selection bias, but they are prevented in RCTs by blinding and randomization [41]. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was to assess the impacts of supplementation with MP on glycemic parameters.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework [42]. The study protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023424242).

Search strategy

One reviewer implemented a search strategy to determine relevant RCTs published up to December 2022 in various databases (Medline/ PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus). The language and period of publications were unrestricted. Google Translate was used to translate articles that were not written in English. The search strategy was focused on four key elements in trials with parallel or crossover design; they were population (adult), exposure/intervention (MP supplement), comparator/control (no intervention or placebo), and outcomes (levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and fasting insulin). The subsequent medical subject headings (MeSH) and non-MESH were used in the search strategy: (("milk" OR "milk protein" OR "milk protein supplement" OR "milk protein supplementation" OR "whey" OR "casein" OR "whey supplement" OR "whey supplementation" OR "casein supplement" OR "casein supplementation" OR "milk protein concentration" OR "MPC") AND ("glucose tolerance" OR "insulin resistance" OR "FBG" OR "fasting blood glucose" OR "HbA1c" OR "hemoglobin A1c" OR "HOMA-IR" OR "homeostatic model assessment" OR "Insulin" OR "fasting blood sugar" OR "FBS") AND ("Intervention" OR "Intervention Study" OR "Intervention Studies" OR "controlled trial" OR "randomized" OR "randomised" OR "random" OR "randomly" OR "placebo" OR "clinical trial" OR "Trial" OR "randomized controlled trial" OR "randomized clinical trial" OR "RCT" OR "blinded" OR "double-blind" OR "double blinded" OR "trial" OR "clinical trial" OR "trials" OR "Pragmatic Clinical Trial" OR "Cross-Over Studies" OR "Cross-Over" OR "Cross-Over Study" OR "parallel" OR "parallel study" OR "parallel trial")).

Study selection criteria

Identified records were exported to the Endnote reference management software. Two reviewers (SM and SD) independently assessed the studies and determined appropriate RCTs based on the inclusion criteria. They discussed any disagreements or resolved them through negotiation with a third investigator (DAL). This systematic review and meta-analysis included all RCTs (with crossover or parallel design) that looked at the effect of MP administration on serum levels of HbA1c, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and FBG in MP supplement-treated individuals compared with their untreated counterparts.

Eligible RCTs enrolled adult individuals and had a cross-over or parallel design, as well as a placebo or control group. They had a pre-post design with a duration longer than two weeks. In addition, the RCTs had sufficient data on the values of HOMA-IR, fasting insulin, HbA1c, and FBG in the MP-treated and placebo groups at the end of each study and baseline. The trials evaluated the impact of supplementation with MP on the glycemic parameters in participants. Furthermore, the MP supplement was not administered as a multi-component supplement in the MP-treated and placebo groups. Moreover, RCTs with one of the following criteria were excluded: non-placebo-controlled or uncontrolled trials; studies that included individuals under 18 years of age or pregnant women; RCTs with < 2 weeks in duration; non-RCTs or observational studies; trials with inadequate data on selected outcomes at follow-up or baseline assessments.

Data extraction

Two independent researchers (SM and HSO) extracted data from eligible full-text articles to determine the required information; disagreements were resolved through discussion. The extracted data were related to study characteristics (sample size, publication year, trial duration and setting, study design, dose of MP supplement, type of placebo or control group, and first author’s name), and participants’ demographics (mean body mass index (BMI), age, and gender). In addition, pre- and post-assessments of selected outcomes (HOMA-IR, FBG, HbA1c, and fasting insulin) were collected at the endpoints and baseline of the study.

Risk of bias assessment

Two independent researchers (SM and NA) appraised the quality of the trials based on the modified Cochrane risk of bias (RoB 2) tool [43]. It identified possible causes of bias including attrition bias, performance bias, allocation bias, reporting bias, and detection bias. The RoB for each domain was deemed high, unclear, and low [43].

Certainty assessment

The certainty of the evidence was assessed by applying the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach, which categorizes the quality of evidence as moderate, very low, low, and high [44].

Statistical analysis

Meta-analysis was performed by applying the STATA statistical software (version 17). The effects of MP administration on the glycemic parameters were measured as a 95% confidence interval (CI) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) for total changes of trial outcomes from baseline to endpoints in the MP-treated and untreated groups. The outcome measures were presented as standard deviation (SD) and mean. The effect sizes were determined by the mean differences. The following formula was applied to calculate SD changes from pre-to post-intervention: SD change = √ (SD2 baseline + SD2 final)– (2 × R correlation coefficient × SD baseline × SD final) [45]. The random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled WMDs [46]. The heterogeneity among RCTs was evaluated by applying the I2 statistic [47] and Cochrane’s Q test. The I2 values 25–50%, < 25%, 50–75%, and > 75%, were considered as moderate, low, high, and very high heterogeneity between RCTs, respectively [48].

Sub-group analyses were applied to identify the possible sources of heterogeneity among the included RCTs. The analysis was based on baseline serum levels of the outcomes (HbA1c, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and FBG), trial duration (> 8 weeks vs. ≤ 8 weeks), the dose of MP supplement (≥ 60 g/d vs. 30–60 g/d vs. < 30 g/d), protein supplementation type (WP vs. CP vs. MP), gender (male vs. both female and male vs. female), and baseline BMI of participants (overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) vs. obese(> 30 kg/m2) vs. normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m2)). Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were utilized to determine the effect of each study on the overall analysis. In addition, funnel plots, Egger's [49], and Begg's tests [50] were employed to determine probable publication bias. In addition, a P-value less than 0.05 was reported as statistically significant. The fractional polynomial model was used to find the possible non-linear impacts of the dose of MP supplement (g/d) and the trial duration (weeks). In addition, meta-regression was performed to evaluate a dose–response slope for a potential linear relationship between effect sizes, trial length, and dose of MP supplement [51].

Results

Study selection

A primary search among multi-databases yielded 15,632 records. After excluding 5238 duplicate studies, 10,394 records were screened, and 10,287 citations were excluded based on their titles and abstracts. Full texts of 107 articles were assessed, and 36 eligible RCTs that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed in this study. A flowchart of the study selection and screening process is illustrated in Supplemental Fig. 1.

Study characteristics

The present systematic review and meta-analysis included 36 trials. Characteristics of the included RCTs are presented in Table 1. Thirty-four RCTs had parallel designs [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85], while two were cross-over trials [86, 87]. The total number of participants in all trials was 1851 (MP supplement-treated group, n = 975; controls, n = 992), with mean age and BMI ranging from 18 to 85 years and 20 to 37 kg/m2, respectively. The sample sizes ranged from 16 to 171 participants. Twenty RCTs [52,53,54,55,56,57,58, 62, 63, 66, 70, 71, 74,75,76, 79, 80, 82, 83, 87] used a mixed-sex sample, while seven and nine studies had a women-only sample [64, 68, 69, 77, 78, 81, 86] or a men-only sample [59,60,61, 65, 67, 72, 73, 84, 85], respectively.

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis
Full size table

The trials enrolled patients with pre-or mild hypertension [52, 79], amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [55], metabolic syndrome [58], after bariatric surgery (> 24 months) [69], hypoalbuminemia on peritoneal dialysis [70], T2DM [73, 76], and sarcopenic elderly men [67]. In addition, the RCTs were carried out among participants with overweight or obesity [53, 54, 56, 60, 61, 64,65,66, 75, 78, 80, 84], visceral fat [57], or abdominal obesity [83], and post-menopausal women [68] with overweight [86] or obesity [81]. The studies also included older women with sarcopenic obesity [77], futsal players [85], nursing home residents [62], elderly adults [63, 71, 82], and healthy individuals [59, 72, 74] with mildly elevated blood pressure (BP) [36].

The articles were published between 2007 and 2022. The RCTs were performed in Germany [52, 58], Australia [53, 56, 86], Netherlands [54], Brazil [55, 69, 77, 78], Japan [57], Portugal [85], Sweden [59, 84], and Iran [60, 61, 65, 81]. The settings of studies were also Finland [62], the Czech Republic [63], the United States(US) [64, 66, 68, 72, 74, 80, 82], the United Kingdom(UK) [87], Canada [67], Israel [70], Norway [71], New Zealand [73], Denmark [75, 83], Italy [76], and China [79]. The length of the trials was between 3 and 72 weeks and the doses of MP, WP, or CP supplements ranged from 3.5 to 90 g per day. The risk of bias evaluation among 36 RCTs is displayed in Supplemental Table 1.

The GRADE evaluation of the overall certainty of the evidence for the measured outcomes is summarized in Supplemental Table 2. The HbA1c outcome was downgraded to low quality due to serious limitations in inconsistency and imprecision. High certainty of evidence was allocated to fasting insulin outcome. In addition, moderate quality evidence was considered for FBG and HOMA-IR outcomes because of a very serious risk of inconsistency or serious limitations in publication bias and inconsistency, respectively.

Table 2 Subgroup analyses of supplementation with milk protein on glycemic parameters
Full size table

Effect of supplementation with milk protein on serum FBG

Thirty-four RCTs (42 trial arms) [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67, 69, 71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87] with 1731 participants (MP-treated group, n = 919; placebo group, n = 928) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis displayed that MP supplementation effectively reduced serum concentrations of FBG in the MP supplement-treated group compared with their untreated counterparts (WMD: -1.83 mg/dL, 95% CI: -3.28, -0.38; P = 0.01). In addition, there was considerable heterogeneity between trials (I2 = 88.3%, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1). Sub-group analyses explored that serum FBG levels were considerably reduced upon short-term administration (≤ 8 weeks) of a low daily dose of WP (< 30 g) among female participants with normal or overweight BMI and higher baseline FBG (> 100 mg/dL) (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Forest plot for the effect of supplementation with milk protein on fasting blood glucose (FBG) (mg/dL). Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random-effects analysis. The effect column comprises weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% CIs

Full size image

Effect of supplementation with milk protein on fasting insulin

The effect of MP administration on serum fasting insulin values was evaluated in 20 RCTs [52,53,54, 57,58,59, 62, 64, 66, 67, 75,76,77,78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 86, 87] that involved 1100 participants (603 cases and 613 controls). A pooled analysis of 24 effect sizes indicated that the level of serum fasting insulin was considerably lower in the MP-treated group than in the control group (WMD: -1.06 uU/mL, 95% CI: -1.76, -0.36; P = 0.003). There was significant heterogeneity among RCTs (I2 = 50.1%, P = 0.003) (Fig. 2). Subgroup analyses depicted similar outcomes based on long-term supplementation with high or moderate daily doses of WP (≥ 60 or 30–60 g) among participants of both sexes (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot for the effect of supplementation with milk protein on fasting insulin (uU/mL). Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random-effects analysis. The effect column comprises weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% CIs

Full size image

Effect of supplementation with milk protein on serum HbA1c

The meta-analysis of five studies (6 arms) [54, 57, 58, 70, 76] with 432 participants explored no significant changes in serum concentrations of HbA1c in the MP supplement-treated group compared to the untreated group (WMD: 0.01%, 95% CI: -0.14, 0.16; P = 0.89) with a high degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 82%, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3). However, there was a substantial decline in serum levels of HbA1c among participants with normal baseline BMI based on sub-analyses (Table 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot for the effect of supplementation with milk protein on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%). Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random-effects analysis. The effect column comprises weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% CIs

Full size image

Effect of supplementation with milk protein on HOMA-IR

Seventeen trials [52, 54, 58, 59, 64, 66, 68, 69, 73, 76,77,78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 87] with 20 effect sizes and 940 participants revealed the impact of MP supplementation on HOMA-IR values. The meta-analysis displayed that the mean value of HOMA-IR was considerably lower in the experimental group than in the controls (WMD: -0.27, 95% CI: -0.40, -0.14; P < 0. 00.1) (Fig. 4). In addition, substantial heterogeneity was found between trials (I2 = 49.9%, P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis indicated that HOMA-IR values were significantly lower in the MP supplement-treated group than their untreated counterparts in short- and long-term supplementation (≤ 8 and > 8 weeks) with high or moderate doses (≥ 60 or 30–60 g/d) of MP or WP; similar outcomes were detected in subgroups including participants of both sexes with a normal or obese baseline BMI, and high or low baseline HOMA-IR values (> 2 or < 2) (Table 2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot for the effect of supplementation with milk protein on homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random-effects analysis. The effect column comprises weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% CIs

Full size image

Publication bias

Visual inspection of the funnel plots displayed different degrees of asymmetry for all assessed outcomes (Supplemental Fig. 2). There was no publication bias for FBG, HbA1c, or fasting insulin outcomes based on Begg’s and Egger's tests. However, there was publication bias for the HOMA-IR outcome (P = 0.033) according to Egger's test.

Linear and non-linear dose–response relations

There was no linear (Supplemental Figs. 5 and 6) or non-linear (Supplemental Figs. 3 and 4) relationship between changes in trial duration or doses of MP supplement and serum HbA1c values based on the dose–response assessment. There was a substantial non-linear association between changes in the duration of the intervention and serum levels of FBG (P = 0.005; Supplemental Fig. 4A) and fasting insulin (P = 0.03, Supplemental Fig. 4B), as well as between doses of MP supplements and changes in HOMA-IR values (P = 0.02; Supplemental Fig. 3D).

Sensitivity analysis

Excluding any specific study did not affect the evaluated outcomes (values of fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, and FBG) based on sensitivity analysis.

Discussion

This dose–response meta-analysis of 36 RCTs evaluated the impact of MP administration on the glycemic parameters in adults. It was indicated that supplementation with milk protein effectively reduced the levels of HOMA-IR, fasting insulin, and FBG while making no remarkable changes in serum HbA1c values. However, there was a significant decline in serum levels of HbA1c among participants with normal baseline BMI based on sub-analyses.

A subgroup analysis revealed that HOMA-IR values were significantly lower in the MP supplement-treated group than their untreated counterparts in short- and long-term supplementation (≤ 8 and > 8 weeks) with high or moderate doses (≥ 60 or 30–60 g/d) of MP or WP; similar outcomes were detected in subgroups among participants of both sexes with a normal or obese baseline BMI, and high or low baseline HOMA-IR values (> 2 or < 2). In addition, it explored that serum FBG levels were considerably reduced upon short-term administration (≤ 8 weeks) of a low daily dose of WP (< 30 g) among female participants with normal or overweight BMI, and higher baseline FBG (> 100 mg/dL). Furthermore, the levels of serum fasting insulin were remarkably decreased during long-term supplementation with high or moderate daily doses of WP among participants of both sexes. The dose–response assessment showed a significant non-linear relationship between changes in the intervention duration and serum concentrations of FBG and fasting insulin, as well as between doses of MP supplements and changes in HOMA-IR values.

This meta-analysis suggests that supplementation with MP could significantly ameliorate some glycemic parameters (fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and FBG) of adults. However, the improvements were relatively small and might not be clinically significant. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for FBG and HA1C is between ≥ 14 and ≥ 0.5% mg/dL, respectively [88, 89]. The hypoglycemic effects of MP supplements are lower than MCID, which means that the impact is clinically insignificant.

A meta-analysis of 22 RCTs indicated that WP administration significantly decreased the values of HOMA-IR, HBA1c, and fasting insulin in patients with metabolic syndrome, but did not have any impact on FBG levels [90]. A systematic review of 58 RCTs explored that WP exerts a significant impact on glycemic control primarily by stimulating incretins and insulin secretion, suppressing appetite, and slowing down gastric emptying [39]. In addition, a comprehensive review of the literature stated the positive impacts of WP supplementation on improving postprandial glycemic control in the short term based on a few studies [91]. Another meta-analysis of five RCTs revealed that premeal WP supplementation is beneficial to ameliorate postprandial glycemia in patients with well-controlled or mild T2DM without significant adverse effects [37]. Some observational studies have reported a negative correlation between milk consumption and hyperglycemia [92, 93]. A prospective study displayed that a higher intake of dairy products was related to a lower 9-year incidence of hyperglycemia [92]. Another prospective cohort study among 15,512 adults in China (median follow-up of 9 years) declared that dairy consumption such as liquid milk and milk powder, was inversely associated with reduced diabetes risk [93]. However, most previous interventional trials failed to highlight the findings from observational studies regarding supplementation with MP.

It has been revealed that the insulinotropic impact of MP is related to certain AAs, in particular BCAAs [94]. Leucine induces glutamate dehydrogenase activity in β-cells that leads to an enhancement in Krebs cycle activity and insulin production [95]. In addition, WP as a fast digestible protein and a remarkable source of BCAAs promotes the circulation and release of insulin that may reduce postprandial hyperglycemia [90]. Bioactive peptides also induce the release of incretin hormones including glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) that play a significant role in the enhancement of insulin resistance [96].

The maintenance of glucose levels involves a complex interaction between insulin-sensitive peripheral tissues and pancreatic β-cells [97]. The AAs are vital nutrients that may induce a diversity of indirect and direct impacts at the organismal and cellular levels [97]. However, there is a debate regarding the optimal amount of dietary protein for T2DM patients [97, 98]. It has been proposed that excessive amounts of AAs may reduce insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and increase insulin resistance [97]. A meta-analysis of eight RCTs explored that the consumption of proteins, particularly animal proteins, may be associated with an increased risk of T2DM [99].

The current study demonstrated a considerable reduction in serum FBG levels in RCTs that were short-term interventions with low-dose WP administration. Previous studies have revealed that the short-term effects of WP supplementation were equivalent to insulin therapy or sulfonylurea for the treatment of hyperglycemia in T2DM patients [28, 100, 101]. These promising results have only been displayed in short-term clinical trials. Therefore, short-term epidemiological and clinical evidence suggests that dairy proteins may ameliorate hyperglycemia. Although the outcomes of the present study proposed that the insulin-lowering effects of MP supplements are more efficient at higher doses and long-term interventions, further long-term RCTs are essential to confirm the proper efficacy, safety, and dosage of consistent consumption of MP supplements.

There were several strengths in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. This study is the first dose–response meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of supplementation with MP on the glycemic profile of adults. There was no restricted search period for selecting all eligible RCTs in a systematic search. In addition, a considerable number of studies were included in the analysis. Most of the RCTs in this meta-analysis had good or fair quality. Several limitations to the outcomes of this study should be considered. Dietary protein and carbohydrate intakes of participants were not reported in the majority of studies. The included RCTs in this meta-analysis had different control or non-intervened groups. Furthermore, there was considerable heterogeneity between trials related to each outcome. Therefore, a pre-defined subgroup analysis was employed to identify the cause of heterogeneity based on several variables, including supplement dose, intervention length, baseline BMI, baseline glycemic status, and gender of participants.

In conclusion, supplementation with MP may ameliorate the glycemic profile in adults by reducing the values of HOMA-IR, FBG, and fasting insulin. However, glycemic changes following MP administration were lower than MCID; therefore, its hypoglycemic effects were minor and may not reach clinical importance. Additional RCTs with longer durations are expected to confirm these findings.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are presented in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

HbA1c:

Hemoglobin A1c

HOMA-IR:

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

HBG:

High blood glucose

CVDs:

Cardiovascular diseases

CHO:

Carbohydrates

GI:

Glycemic index

WP:

Whey protein

CP:

Casein Protein

MP:

Milk Protein

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

MeSH:

Medical subject headings

RoB:

Risk of bias

WMD:

Weighted mean difference

SD:

Standard deviation

CI:

Confidence interval

ALS:

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

GRADE:

Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation

MCID:

Minimum clinically important difference

BMI:

Body mass index

PROSPPERO:

International prospective register of systematic reviews

References

  1. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al KJ. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes–global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Global Health. 2020;10(1):107.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Korytkowski M, McDonnell ME, Umpierrez GE, Zonszein J. Patient guide to managing hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) in the hospital. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(1):27A–A28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aronson D. Hyperglycemia and the pathobiology of diabetic complications. Cardiovascular Diabetology: Clinical, Metabolic Inflammat Facets. 2008;45:1–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giugliano D, Ceriello A, Esposito K. Glucose metabolism and hyperglycemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(1):217S–S222.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lemkes BA, Hermanides J, DeVries JH, Holleman F, Meijers JC, Hoekstra JB. Hyperglycemia: a prothrombotic factor? J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(8):1663–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Munekawa C, Okada H, Hamaguchi M, Habu M, Kurogi K, Murata H, et al. Fasting plasma glucose level in the range of 90–99 mg/dL and the risk of the onset of type 2 diabetes: Population-based Panasonic cohort study 2. J Diabetes Investig. 2022;13(3):453–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarwar N, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G, Gobin R, Seshasai SRK, Forouhi NG, et al. Markers of dysglycaemia and risk of coronary heart disease in people without diabetes: Reykjavik prospective study and systematic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(5):e1000278.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jafar N, Edriss H, Nugent K. The effect of short-term hyperglycemia on the innate immune system. Am J Med Sci. 2016;351(2):201–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeon H-Y, Lee A-J, Ha K-S. Polymer-based delivery of peptide drugs to treat diabetes: normalizing hyperglycemia and preventing diabetic complications. BioChip J. 2022;16(2):111–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shkembi B, Huppertz TJF. Glycemic Responses of Milk and Plant-Based Drinks: Food Matrix Effects. Foods. 2023;12(3):453.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Evert AB, Boucher JL, Cypress M, Dunbar SA, Franz MJ, Mayer-Davis EJ, et al. Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):S120–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Asbaghi O, Ashtary-Larky D, Bagheri R, Moosavian SP, Olyaei HP, Nazarian B, et al. Folic acid supplementation improves glycemic control for diabetes prevention and management: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2021;13(7):2355.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Asbaghi O, Fouladvand F, Gonzalez MJ, Ashtary-Larky D, Choghakhori R, Abbasnezhad AJD, et al. Effect of green tea on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2021;15(1):23–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nosratabadi S, Ashtary-Larky D, Hoseini F, Namkhah Z, Mohammadi S, Salamat S, et al. The effects of vitamin C supplementation on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2023;17(8):102824.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marangoni F, Pellegrino L, Verduci E, Ghiselli A, Bernabei R, Calvani R, et al. Cow’s milk consumption and health: a health professional’s guide. J Am Coll Nutr. 2019;38(3):197–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huppertz T, Vasiljevic T. Understanding and improving the functional and nutritional properties of milk. Cambridge: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited; 2022. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/1471-0307.12870.

  17. Romero-Velarde E, Delgado-Franco D, García-Gutiérrez M, Gurrola-Díaz C, Larrosa-Haro A, Montijo-Barrios E, et al. The importance of lactose in the human diet: Outcomes of a Mexican consensus meeting. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2737.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Leary M, Tanaka H. Role of fluid milk in attenuating postprandial hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Nutrients. 2020;12(12):3806.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Panahi S, El Khoury D, Kubant R, Akhavan T, Luhovyy BL, Goff HD, et al. Mechanism of action of whole milk and its components on glycemic control in healthy young men. 2014;25(11):1124-31.

  20. Davoodi SH, Shahbazi R, Esmaeili S, Sohrabvandi S, Mortazavian A, Jazayeri S, et al. Health-related aspects of milk proteins. Iran J Pharm Res. 2016;15(3):573–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nongonierma AB, FitzGerald RJ. Bioactive properties of milk proteins in humans: a review. Peptides. 2015;73:20–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raikos V, Dassios T. Health-promoting properties of bioactive peptides derived from milk proteins in infant food: a review. Dairy Scie Technol. 2014;94:91–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Frid AH, Nilsson M, Holst JJ, Björck IM. Effect of whey on blood glucose and insulin responses to composite breakfast and lunch meals in type 2 diabetic subjects–. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(1):69–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Horstman AM, Huppertz T. Milk proteins: Processing, gastric coagulation, amino acid availability and muscle protein synthesis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;1–16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/10408398.2022.2078782.

  25. Pal S, Radavelli-Bagatini S, Hagger M, Ellis V. Comparative effects of whey and casein proteins on satiety in overweight and obese individuals: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(9):980–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilborn CD, Taylor LW, Outlaw J, Williams L, Campbell B, Foster CA, et al. The effects of pre-and post-exercise whey vs. casein protein consumption on body composition and performance measures in collegiate female athletes. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12(1):74–9.

  27. Kumar KS, Yatoo MI, Mohapatra RK, Dhama K. Major health effects of casein and whey proteins present in cow milk: a narrative review. Indian Vet J. 2021;98(11):09–19.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McGregor RA, Poppitt SD. Milk protein for improved metabolic health: a review of the evidence. Nutr Metab. 2013;10(1):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hall W, Millward D, Long S, Morgan L. Casein and whey exert different effects on plasma amino acid profiles, gastrointestinal hormone secretion and appetite. Br J Nutr. 2003;89(2):239–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Loon LJ, Kruijshoop M, Menheere PP, Wagenmakers AJ, Saris WH, Keizer HA. Amino acid ingestion strongly enhances insulin secretion in patients with long-term type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):625–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Petersen BL, Ward LS, Bastian ED, Jenkins AL, Campbell J, Vuksan V. A whey protein supplement decreases post-prandial glycemia. Nutr J. 2009;8:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gunnerud U, Östman E, Björck I. Effects of whey proteins on glycaemia and insulinaemia to an oral glucose load in healthy adults; a dose–response study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(7):749–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Akhavan T, Luhovyy BL, Panahi S, Kubant R, Brown PH, Anderson GH. Mechanism of action of pre-meal consumption of whey protein on glycemic control in young adults. J Nutr Biochem. 2014;25(1):36–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Almario RU, Buchan WM, Rocke DM, Karakas SE. Glucose-lowering effect of whey protein depends upon clinical characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000420.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. King DG, Walker M, Campbell MD, Breen L, Stevenson EJ, West DJ. A small dose of whey protein co-ingested with mixed-macronutrient breakfast and lunch meals improves postprandial glycemia and suppresses appetite in men with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(4):550–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hidayat K, Du X, Shi BM. Milk in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: the potential role of milk proteins. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019;35(8):e3187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chiang S-W, Liu H-W, Loh E-W, Tam K-W, Wang J-Y, Huang W-L, et al. Whey protein supplementation improves postprandial glycemia in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Res. 2022;104:44–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pasin G, Comerford KB. Dairy foods and dairy proteins in the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Adv Nutr. 2015;6(3):245–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Nouri M, Gargari BP, Tajfar P, Tarighat-Esfanjani A. A systematic review of whey protein supplementation effects on human glycemic control: A mechanistic insight. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022;16(7):102540.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Metelli S, Chaimani A. Challenges in meta-analyses with observational studies. BMJ Ment Health. 2020;23(2):83–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mariani AW, Pego-Fernandes PM. Observational studies: why are they so important? Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(1):1–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88:105906.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/bmj.l4898.

  44. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/9780470743386.

  46. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synthesis Methods. 2010;1(2):97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc. 1988;1MP supplementation on the glycemic parameters51(3):419–45.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mitchell MN. Interpreting and visualizing regression models using Stata. College Station: Stata Press; 2012. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/1475-4932.12023.

  52. Lee YM, Skurk T, Hennig M, Hauner H. Effect of a milk drink supplemented with whey peptides on blood pressure in patients with mild hypertension. Eur J Nutr. 2007;46(1):21–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Keogh JB, Clifton P. The effect of meal replacements high in glycomacropeptide on weight loss and markers of cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(6):1602–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Claessens M, van Baak MA, Monsheimer S, Saris WH. The effect of a low-fat, high-protein or high-carbohydrate ad libitum diet on weight loss maintenance and metabolic risk factors. Int J Obes (Lond). 2009;33(3):296–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Silva LB, Mourão LF, Silva AA, Lima NM, Almeida SR, Franca MC Jr, et al. Effect of nutritional supplementation with milk whey proteins in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010;68(2):263–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pal S, Ellis V, Dhaliwal S. Effects of whey protein isolate on body composition, lipids, insulin and glucose in overweight and obese individuals. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(5):716–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Takahira M, Noda K, Fukushima M, Zhang B, Mitsutake R, Uehara Y, et al. Randomized, double-blind, controlled, comparative trial of formula food containing soy protein vs milk protein in visceral fat obesity FLAVO study. Circ J. 2011;75(9):2235–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gouni-Berthold I, Schulte DM, Krone W, Lapointe JF, Lemieux P, Predel HG, et al. The whey fermentation product malleable protein matrix decreases TAG concentrations in patients with the metabolic syndrome: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2012;107(11):1694–706.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hambre D, Vergara M, Lood Y, Bachrach-Lindström M, Lindström T, Nystrom FH. A randomized trial of protein supplementation compared with extra fast food on the effects of resistance training to increase metabolism. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2012;72(6):471–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sheikholeslami VD, Ahmadi Kani GF. Changes in antioxidant status and cardiovascular risk factors of overweight young men after six weeks supplementation of whey protein isolate and resistance training. Appetite. 2012;59(3):673–8.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ahmadi Kani GF, Sheikholeslami-Vatani D. The Effects of whey protein isolate supplementation and resistance training on cardiovascular risk factors in overweight young men. J Isfahan Medical School. 2012;30:289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Björkman M, Finne-Soveri H, Tilvis R. Whey protein supplementation in nursing home residents A randomized controlled trial. Europ Geriatric Medicine. 2012;3:161–6.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rambousková J, Procházka B, Binder M, Anděl M. Vliv podávání tekutého mléčného nutričního doplňku se zvýšeným obsahem syrovátkových bílkovin na nutriční stav seniorů. Vnitřní lékařství. 2014;60(7–8):556–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Piccolo BD, Comerford KB, Karakas SE, Knotts TA, Fiehn O, Adams SH. Whey protein supplementation does not alter plasma branched-chained amino acid profiles but results in unique metabolomics patterns in obese women enrolled in an 8-week weight loss trial. J Nutr. 2015;145(4):691–700.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tahavorgar A, Vafa MR, Shidfar F, Gohari M, Heydari I. Beneficial Effects of Whey Protein Preloads on some Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors of Overweight and Obese Men are Stronger than Soy Protein Preloads – A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Nutr Intermed Metab. 2015;2(3–4):69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Arciero PJ, Edmonds RC, Bunsawat K, Gentile CL, Ketcham C, Darin C, et al. Protein-Pacing from Food or Supplementation Improves Physical Performance in Overweight Men and Women: The PRISE 2 Study. Nutrients. 2016;8(5):288.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Maltais ML, Ladouceur JP, Dionne IJ. The effect of resistance training and different sources of Postexercise protein supplementation on muscle mass and physical capacity in Sarcopenic elderly men. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(6):1680–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Stojkovic V, Simpson CA, Sullivan RR, Cusano AM, Kerstetter JE, Kenny AM, et al. The Effect of Dietary Glycemic Properties on Markers of Inflammation, Insulin Resistance, and Body Composition in Postmenopausal American Women: An Ancillary Study from a Multicenter Protein Supplementation Trial. Nutrients. 2017;9(5):484.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Lopes Gomes D, Moehlecke M, Silva F, Dutra E, Schaan B, Carvalho K. Whey Protein Supplementation Enhances Body Fat and Weight Loss in Women Long After Bariatric Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg. 2017;27(2):424–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Hassan K, Hassan F. Does whey protein supplementation affect blood pressure in hypoalbuminemic peritoneal dialysis patients? Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:989–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Ottestad I, Løvstad AT, Gjevestad GO, Hamarsland H, ŠaltytėBenth J, Andersen LF, et al. Intake of a Protein-Enriched Milk and Effects on Muscle Mass and Strength. A 12-Week Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial among Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(10):1160–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lockwood C, Roberts M, Dalbo V, Smith-Ryan A, Kendall K, Moon J, et al. Effects of hydrolyzed whey versus other whey protein supplements on the physiological response to 8 weeks of resistance exercise in college-aged males. J Am Coll Nutr. 2016;36:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Gaffney KA, Lucero A, Stoner L, Faulkner J, Whitfield P, Krebs J, et al. Nil whey protein effect on glycemic control after intense mixed-mode training in type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(1):11–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sharp MH, Lowery RP, Shields KA, Lane JR, Gray JL, Partl JM, et al. The effects of beef, chicken, or whey protein after workout on body composition and muscle performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(8):2233–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Larsen AE, Bibby BM, Hansen M. Effect of a Whey Protein Supplement on Preservation of Fat Free Mass in Overweight and Obese Individuals on an Energy Restricted Very Low Caloric Diet. Nutrients. 2018;10(12):1918.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Derosa G, D’Angelo A, Maffioli P. Change of some oxidative stress parameters after supplementation with whey protein isolate in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nutrition. 2020;73:110700.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Nabuco HCG, Tomeleri CM, Fernandes RR, Sugihara Junior P, Cavalcante EF, Cunha PM, et al. Effect of whey protein supplementation combined with resistance training on body composition, muscular strength, functional capacity, and plasma-metabolism biomarkers in older women with sarcopenic obesity: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019;32:88–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Giglio BM, Schincaglia RM, da Silva AS, Fazani ICS, Monteiro PA, Mota JF, et al. Whey Protein Supplementation Compared to Collagen Increases Blood Nesfatin Concentrations and Decreases Android Fat in Overweight Women: A Randomized Double-Blind Study. Nutrients. 2019;11(9).

  79. Yang J, Wang HP, Tong X, Li ZN, Xu JY, Zhou L, et al. Effect of whey protein on blood pressure in pre- and mildly hypertensive adults: a randomized controlled study. Food Sci Nutr. 2019;7(5):1857–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Hudson JL, Zhou J, Kim JE, Campbell WW. Incorporating Milk Protein Isolate into an Energy-Restricted Western-Style Eating Pattern Augments Improvements in Blood Pressure and Triglycerides, but Not Body Composition Changes in Adults Classified as Overweight or Obese: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2020;12(3):851.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Haidari F, Aghamohammadi V, Mohammadshahi M, Ahmadi-Angali K, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. Whey protein supplementation reducing fasting levels of anandamide and 2-AG without weight loss in pre-menopausal women with obesity on a weight-loss diet. Trials. 2020;21(1):657.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Lefferts WK, Augustine JA, Spartano NL, Hughes WE, Babcock MC, Heenan BK, et al. Effects of Whey Protein Supplementation on Aortic Stiffness, Cerebral Blood Flow, and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Findings from the ANCHORS A-WHEY Clinical Trial. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1054.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Fuglsang-Nielsen R, Rakvaag E, Langdahl B, Knudsen KEB, Hartmann B, Holst JJ, et al. Effects of whey protein and dietary fiber intake on insulin sensitivity, body composition, energy expenditure, blood pressure, and appetite in subjects with abdominal obesity. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021;75(4):611–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Pettersson S, Edin F, Hjelte C, Scheinost D, Wagner S, Ekblom B, et al. Six Weeks of Aerobic Exercise in Untrained Men With Overweight/Obesity Improved Training Adaptations, Performance and Body Composition Independent of Oat/Potato or Milk Based Protein-Carbohydrate Drink Supplementation. Front Nutr. 2021;8:617344.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Teixeira FJ, Matias CN, Faleiro J, Giro R, Pires J, Figueiredo H, et al. A Novel Plant-Based Protein Has Similar Effects Compared to Whey Protein on Body Composition, Strength, Power, and Aerobic Performance in Professional and Semi-Professional Futsal Players. Front Nutr. 2022;9:934438.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Pal S, Ellis V, Ho S. Acute effects of whey protein isolate on cardiovascular risk factors in overweight, post-menopausal women. Atherosclerosis. 2010;212(1):339–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Fekete ÁA, Giromini C, Chatzidiakou Y, Givens DI, Lovegrove JA. Whey protein lowers blood pressure and improves endothelial function and lipid biomarkers in adults with prehypertension and mild hypertension: results from the chronic Whey2Go randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104(6):1534–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Lenters-Westra E, Schindhelm R, Bilo H, Groenier K, Slingerland RJNJM. Differences in interpretation of haemoglobin A1c values among diabetes care professionals. Neth J Med. 2014;72(9):462–6.

  89. Chan LSJAjoph. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID)—adding meaning to statistical inference. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(11):e24–25.

  90. Amirani E, Milajerdi A, Reiner Ž, Mirzaei H, Mansournia MA, Asemi Z. Effects of whey protein on glycemic control and serum lipoproteins in patients with metabolic syndrome and related conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Giglio BM, Lobo PC, Pimentel GD. Effects of whey protein supplementation on adiposity, body weight and glycemic parameters: A synthesis of evidence. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;33(2):258–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Fumeron F, Lamri A, Abi Khalil C, Jaziri R, Porchay-Baldérelli I, Lantieri O, et al. Dairy consumption and the incidence of hyperglycemia and the metabolic syndrome: results from a French prospective study. Data Epidemiol Study Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR). 2011;34(4):813–7.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Yang Y, Na X, Xi Y, Xi M, Yang H, Li Z, et al. Association between dairy consumption and the risk of diabetes: A prospective cohort study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Front Nutr. 2022;9:997636.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Lesgards J-F. Benefits of whey proteins on type 2 diabetes mellitus parameters and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Nutrients. 2023;15(5):1294.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Tome D. Protein, amino acids and the control of food intake. Br J Nutr. 2004;92(S1):S27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Adams RL, Broughton KS. Insulinotropic effects of whey: mechanisms of action, recent clinical trials, and clinical applications. Ann Nutr Metab. 2016;69(1):56–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Ancu O, Mickute M, Guess ND, Hurren NM, Burd NA, Mackenzie RW. Does high dietary protein intake contribute to the increased risk of developing prediabetes and type 2 diabetes? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2021;46(1):1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Hamdy O, Horton ES. Protein content in diabetes nutrition plan. Curr DiabRep. 2011;11:111–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Zhao L-G, Zhang Q-L, Liu X-L, Wu H, Zheng J-L, Xiang Y-B. Dietary protein intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Nutr. 2019;58:1351–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ma J, Stevens JE, Cukier K, Maddox AF, Wishart JM, Jones KL, et al. Effects of a protein preload on gastric emptying, glycemia, and gut hormones after a carbohydrate meal in diet-controlled type 2 diabetes. 2009;32(9):1600–2.

  101. Jakubowicz D, Froy O, Ahrén B, Boaz M, Landau Z, Bar-Dayan Y, et al. Incretin, insulinotropic and glucose-lowering effects of whey protein pre-load in type 2 diabetes: a randomised clinical trial. Diabetologia. 2014;57(9):1807–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no specific funding for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

    Shooka Mohammadi & Damoon Ashtary-Larky

  2. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Shooka Mohammadi

  3. Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Omid Asbaghi

  4. Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Omid Asbaghi

  5. Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Sina Dolatshahi, Hossein Salehi Omran & Kian Goudarzi

  6. Faculty of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Niusha Amirani

  7. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Fatemeh Jahangir Koozehkanani

  8. Department of Nutrition, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran

    Hossein Bagherzadeh Garmjani

Authors
  1. Shooka Mohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omid Asbaghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sina Dolatshahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hossein Salehi Omran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Niusha Amirani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fatemeh Jahangir Koozehkanani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hossein Bagherzadeh Garmjani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kian Goudarzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Damoon Ashtary-Larky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DAL, SM, and OA prepared the study protocol. SM, SD, HSO, and NA contributed to the extraction, search of the data, and screening. OA conducted data analysis. SM and DAL provided the first draft of the manuscript. The last version of the manuscript has been read and accepted by all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shooka Mohammadi or Damoon Ashtary-Larky.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplemental Table 1. Risk of bias assessment for included RCTs in the meta-analysis. Supplemental Table 2. GRADE assessment. Supplemental Fig. 1. Flow diagram of study selection. Supplemental Fig. 2. Funnel plots for the effect of supplementation with milk protein on (A) fasting blood glucose (FBG) (B) fasting insulin (C) hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c), and (D) homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Supplemental Fig. 3. Non-linear dose-response association between dose (gr/day) of supplementation with milk protein and absolute mean differences in (A) fasting blood glucose (FBG) (B) fasting insulin (C) hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c), and (D) homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The 95% CI (confidence interval) is demonstrated in the shaded parts. Supplemental Fig. 4. Non-linear association between duration of the supplementation with milk protein (weeks) and absolute mean differences in (A) fasting blood glucose (FBG) (B) fasting insulin (C) hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c), and (D) homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The 95% CI (confidence interval) is depicted in the shaded parts. Supplemental Fig. 5. Linear dose-response association between dose (gr/day) of supplementation with milk protein and absolute mean differences in (A) fasting blood glucose (FBG) (B) fasting insulin (C) hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c), and (D) homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Supplemental Fig. 6. Linear association between duration of the supplementation with milk protein (weeks) and absolute mean differences in (A) fasting blood glucose (FBG) (B) fasting insulin (C) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and (D) homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadi, S., Asbaghi, O., Dolatshahi, S. et al. Effects of supplementation with milk protein on glycemic parameters: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Nutr J 22, 49 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12937-023-00878-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12937-023-00878-1

Keywords

Nutrition Journal

ISSN: 1475-2891

Contact us