Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of multivariable logistic regression analysis of potential factors associated with adolescents’ soft drinks intake (low vs. high) (N = 826) *

From: Mediators of parental educational differences in the intake of carbonated sugar-sweetened soft drinks among adolescents, and the moderating role of neighbourhood income

 

Soft drinks intake

OR (95% CI)

Self-efficacy

0.88 (0.73, 1.06)

Parental rules for SSB intake

0.87 (0.74, 1.02)

Perceived accessibility of SSB at home

1.63 (1.31, 2.03)*

Parental modelling for SSB intake

1.28 (1.03, 1.60)*

Maternal norm

0.87 (0.63,1.20)

Paternal norm

1.01 (0.76,1.35)

Frequency of food/drink purchased from the neighbourhood shops

1.21(1.05, 1.39)*

Perceived neighbourhood accessibility of kiosk

0.90 (0.79, 1.03)

Density of restaurants

0 restaurant

Ref

< 3 restaurants

1.44 (0.89, 2.34)

≥ 3 restaurants

1.23 (0.82, 1.85)

  1. The model is adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, family structure and parental education and data collection period, * indicates associations significant at p-value ≤ 0.05, OR Odds ratio, CI confidence intervals, SSB sugar-sweetened beverages