Prognostic and clinicopathological impacts of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score on patients with gynecological cancer: a meta-analysis

Table 5 The correlation between CONUT and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with gynecological cancer

Variables	No. of studies	No. of patients	Effects model	OR (95% CI)	p	Heterogeneity
Variables	No. of studies	No. of patients	Effects model	OR (95% CI)	p	I²(%)	Ph
Histological grade (G3 vs G1-G2)	3	627	Fixed	1.76 (1.18–2.62)	0.006	0	0.980
FIGO stage (III-IV vs I-II)	2	505	Fixed	2.52 (1.54–4.11)	< 0.001	45.5	0.175
Tumor size (≥ 4 cm vs < 4 cm)	2	820	Fixed	1.50 (1.12–2.01)	0.007	0	0.721
Lymph node metastasis (presence vs absence)	2	820	Random	0.98 (0.18–5.27)	0.984	93.2	< 0.001

CONUT controlled nutritional status score, FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

ISSN: 1475-2891