Skip to main content

Table 1 Definitions of and Cut-off values for rating the Clinical Measurement Properties described in this Review

From: Clinical measurement properties of malnutrition assessment tools for use with patients in hospitals: a systematic review

Clinical measurement property

Rating method

Definition [10, 12, 13] and/or Cut-off value [10, 14, 15]

Inter-rater reliability

A measure of the consistency for the scores obtained between two rates that are measuring the same subject.

Test-retest reliability

A property of which the stability of the result using the same outcome measure with the same group of subjects in a repeated test.

Internal consistency

A reliability measure; ensuring all measurement items measure the same context.

 

Kappaa

A preferred statistical measure for rating the inter-rate reliability; cut-off value: ≥ 0.70– acceptable [10, 16, 17].

Cronbach’s αb

A statistical measure for rating the internal consistency; cut-off value: ≥ 0.70– acceptable [10, 18].

ICCc

A statistical measure for rating the reliability; cut-off value: ≥ 0.70– acceptable [10].

Concurrent validity

 

A type of criterion validity; examining the consistency of the score obtained by the testing instrument compared with a gold standard.

Predictive validity

 

A type of criterion validity; measuring a correlation between the testing score and future events.

Construct validity

rd

An essential measurement validity which assesses whether a testing instrument measures what it was made to measure by comparing hypothetical and non-criterion parameters.

A statistical measure for rating the correlation of linear relationship between two variables; cut-off values: > 0.75 - excellent; 0.50 to 0.75 - moderate; 0.25 to 0.49 - mild; < 0.25 – weak [14].

Diagnostic accuracy

ROCe

An ability to discriminate the population with targeted health condition.

A statistical measure for expressing how well the measure can distinguish between two populations; cut-off values: 0.9 to 1.0 - excellent; 0.8 to 0.89 - very good; 0.7 to 0.79 - good; 0.6 to 0.69 - sufficient; 0.5 to 0.59 - insufficient; < 0.5 - no use [15].

Responsiveness to change

An ability to detect the changes in health outcomes following the intervention.

 

MDCf

A statistical measure for rating the response to changes which is not due to the measurement error.

  1. Note. aKappa = Cohen’s Kappa; bCronbach’s α = Cronbach’s alpha; cICC = Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; dr = Pearson’s correlation coefficient; eROC = Receiver Operator Cure; fMDC = minimal detectable change