Skip to main content

Table 4 Results regarding the mediating role of dietary cost in the association between individual educational and household educational level and the DHD15-index and DASH score for females and males separately

From: To what extent do dietary costs explain socio-economic differences in dietary behavior?

Independent variable

Mediator

Dependent variable

Femalesa

Malesb

Indirect effect

Proportion mediated

Indirect effect

Proportion mediated

β

Bootstrap 95%CI

β

Bootstrap 95%CI

 

Dietary cost (€/d)

DHD15- index (score)

Individual educational level

Middle vs. low

0.27*

0.15; 0.40

6.8

−0.02

− 0.18; 0.10

N/A

High vs. low

0.28*

0.18; 0.40

3.3

−0.03

− 0.21; 0.14

N/A

High vs. Middle

0.01

−0.07; 0.10

N/A

−0.01

−0.08; 0.06

N/A

 

Household educational level

Middle vs. low

0.19*

0.10; 0.31

7.1

−0.02

−0.14; 0.08

N/A

High vs. low

0.29*

0.18; 0.42

3.8

−0.04

−0.24; 0.15

N/A

High vs. Middle

 

0.10*

0.02; 0.19

2.0

−0.02

−0.14; 0.09

N/A

 

DASH diet (score)

Individual educational level

Middle vs. low

0.10*

0.06; 0.15

11.0

0.00

−0.04; 0.04

N/A

High vs. low

0.11*

0.07; 0.14

5.4

0.00

−0.05; 0.05

N/A

High vs. Middle

0.01

−0.03; 0.04

N/A

0.00

−0.02; 0.02

N/A

 

Household educational level

Middle vs. low

0.08*

0.04; 0.11

11.7

0.00

−0.03; 0.03

N/A

High vs. low

0.11*

0.08; 0.15

5.8

0.00

−0.05; 0.05

N/A

High vs. Middle

  

0.04*

0.01; 0.07

3.4

0.00

−0.03; 0.04

N/A

  1. Abbreviations: B beta regression coefficient, CI confidence intervals, N/A Not Applicable
  2. aN = 7175 and N = 7182 for individual and household educational level, respectively
  3. bN = 2100 for both individual and household educational level
  4. *P < 0•05
  5. All analyses were adjusted for age, study center and energy intake
  6. Proportion mediated was not calculated for non-significant indirect effects