Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for the association between dietary patterns and NAFLD

From: Association of the dietary patterns with the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among Iranian population: a case-control study

 

T1

T2

T3

P-trend

Ordinary pattern

 Model 1

1

2.95 (1.45–6.03)

11.86 (5.36–26.21)

< 0. 001

 Model 2

1

2.14 (0.97–4.75)

4.55 (1.66–12.46)

< 0.001

 Model 3

1

1.71 (0.71–4.11)

3.74 (1.23–11.42)

< 0.001

Fast food type pattern

 Model 1

1

0.80 (0.39–1.62)

1.01 (0.50–2.05)

0.19

 Model 2

1

0.82 (0.38–1.81)

0.76 (0.30–1.93)

0.24

 Model3

1

0.91 (0.39–2.14)

0.72 (0.26–1.96)

0.19

Traditional pattern

 Model 1

1

2.12 (1.04–4.33)

3.03 (1.41–6.53)

< 0.001

 Model 2

1

2.57 (1.19–5.54)

3.78 (1.66–8.65)

< 0.001

 Model 3

1

2.37 (1.02–5.53)

3.58 (1.48–8.68)

< 0.001

Dairy and vegetable pattern

 Model 1

1

0.79 (0.39–1.59)

0.41 (0.20–0.86)

0.02

 Model 2

1

0.59 (0.28–1.25)

0.21 (0.09–0.49)

0.005

 Model 3

1

0.60 (0.26–1.37)

0.23 (0.09–0.58)

0.02

  1. Model 1: crude
  2. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, BMI and energy intake
  3. Model 3: further adjusted for smoking, educational status, and physical activity