Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of study population within Young-HUNT1; control schools and intervention schools, Young-HUNT1 and Young-HUNT3 and within Young-HUNT3; intervention group and control group

From: Time trends (1995–2008) in dietary habits among adolescents in relation to the Norwegian school fruit scheme: the HUNT study

 

Young-HUNT1***

Young-HUNT1 vs Young-HUNT3

Young-HUNT 3*

Control schools

(n = 2346)

Intervention schools

(n = 1791)

p-value

Young-HUNT1 (N = 4137)

Young-HUNT3 (N = 4113)

p-value

Control group (N = 2855)

Intervention group (N = 1892)

p-value

Age (mean)

14.6

14.7

0.029

14.6

14.5

< 0.001

14.7

14.5

< 0.001

%

%

%

%

%

%

Sex (female)

50

52

0.175

51

50

0.524

49

50

0.740

Educational intentions (higher)

14

16

0.012

15

34

< 0.001

34

35

0.680

Municipality urbanity (urban)

58

62

0.006

60

63

0.013

70

63

< 0.001

Grade junior high

0.399

  

0.005

  

0.026

8 th grade

32

31

32

34

33

36

9 th grade

34

33

34

34

34

33

10 th grade

34

36

35

32

33

30

Dietary consumption (daily)

Fruit

50

51

0.504

50

61

< 0.001

57

67

< 0.001

Vegetables

40

43

0.080

41

52

< 0.001

51

53

0.088

Potato chips

4

4

0.649

4

6

< 0.001

7

6

0.353

Candy

12

13

0.502

13

12

0.555

13

12

0.517

Sugar-sweetened beverages

16

19

0.012

17

29

< 0.001

29

28

0.469

Artificially sweetened beverages**

n.a

n.a

n.a

n.a

19

n.a

19

19

0.806

  1. *In Young-HUNT3, participants who answered the questionnaire before the 1. Of September 2007 was defined as the control group and participants who answered after 1. September 2007 as the intervention group
  2. N.a (not applicable). **Consumption of artificially sweetened beverages was not measured in the Young-HUNT1 survey
  3. ***Young-HUNT1 control schools and intervention schools grouping was based on schools by intervention and control in Young-HUNT3